After weeks of being beaten by commercials promoting Discovery Channel 鈥 檚 first in a series called 鈥 淐 uriosity, 鈥? It would be difficult for anyone with just a bit curious to not give it a try and see a very little.
Produced by John Hendricks, the founder of Discovery Channel, the show will air every sixty episodes to deal with different issues. You have to find a more curious to take in the next fifty-nine, if they are nothing like the first. This is not a mere review of the program, but rather it is a competence of the premise on which it is based. The program was produced and narrated well, but it is difficult to conclude that the intention of using his science to close the mind, not to open them.
Initially, the program is like a flashback to my days as a freshman in college when teachers worked feverishly eager to convince his young disciples, and I, to dismiss any notion of God and establish false advertising learned the church. Using the known battle between Galileo and the Catholic Church seemed to mock at times, and bordering on insult. As always, the argument is what the church fathers, he said, and not about what the Bible says.
Curiosity, along with academics anxious, always leaves out the fact that the Bible has always supported the scientific findings of the true relationship of the sun and the planets of our solar system. The Bible never says the earth is the center of the solar system or universe. For those who walk on the writing alone can only repeat again that, when any Christian sect out of the Word, whether Catholic or a non-denominational megachurch incipient, the secularist will eat and theology as will be labeled as The folly of man and certainly his sentence under the sword of scientific research. Then there is the other side of the coin.
When the single-edged sword of the science of man struggling with double-edged sword of the Word of God there is never any contest.鈥 檚 word God will remain forever. That 鈥 檚 see why.
Curiosity was willing, as expected, willingness to use the bold conclusions drawn pompous and swelling of un-witnessed, the facts can not be verified so-called science. They are based on (again) before philosophical postulates. In short this means that, in describing the events that took place billions of years before anyone could witness, much less subjected to the scrutiny of science, is to delve into the realm of endless conjecture, speculation and forecasting maybe, but not science. What's worse is that 鈥 檚 as it leaves the definition of science, which is the collection of information repeatable observable phenomena, what we have here is an excursion into the realm known as 鈥 榝 to faith.鈥?
Since there is no proof that the universe began with the Big Bang than there is that Christ was raised from the dead you have to activate the element of faith to build the hypothesis. In fact, there is much more historical, archaeological and eyewitness of the resurrection of Christ in the Big Bang, but a topic for another time.
Curiosity, apparently used a series of assumptions to verifiable conclusions giant steps that begs to be examined and subjected to the calm and reasoning of science much harder speculation rather than scanning.
First, depended heavily on the meager results of science in the making all the new quantum mechanics. We are told that a single subatomic particle burst in creating an entire universe then produced what is now known as the laws of nature. From this we conclude that an unknown particle outlaw was floating in space by countless trillions of years until he had the opportunity to produce all there, and give the law, or as Stephen Hawking says, the laws of nature .
In a moment of Hawking says he will not offend those who have faith in God. Not once did they seem to realize that suggesting further requires faith and ultimately is a response that could cost many people dearly. Hawking is heralded as one of the brightest minds of the time, but I realize that all that glitters of a person's talent, virtuosity and intelligence does not necessarily come from God. Christ said that the light inside may be obvious to everyone, but it very well could be the dark and asks the question that every secularist Hawking and others should carefully weigh. 鈥 泪 f therefore the light that is in you is darkness, how great is that darkness 鈥? (Mt 6, 23)
Relying on the findings of quantum science to explain the universe can not be compared with something like the strong and tangible product 鈥 檚 Einstein theory of relativity, but a curious mind under the dominion of fascinating, colorful paintings, graphics the solar system in its infancy, with large explosions Bang, black holes and points of view of countless stars, galaxies and planets, all the strongest minds, but be prepared to accept the program 's conclusions. These conclusions are inherently weak and incomplete, and that is their failure. The premise is faulty was founded by science 鈥 檚 own definition rather than the Bible.
Not once do the narrators of the program or, a theoretical physicist Stephen Hawking attempt to explain the origins of the subatomic particle responsible for fatal fabulous kicking off our universe. One conclusion we can safely, is that science has indicated its own tiny god and creator. Forget the silly old question of how many angels could fit on the head of a pin, now science says millions of creators could establish himself in the same space.
Perhaps the Athenians of ancient Greece is happy to know that science has finally identified the deity (Agnostos Theos) who built the famous temple of the god unknown in the Areopagus. In fact, until science can explain who or what caused or created the original subatomic particle that will have to return to his theorem and look much further back. I would suggest that they have no plan to make in the very near future.
In forty years of asking this question of the origins of the sub-atomic particles that supposedly came together to wake up and create the universe we have only drawn a complete silence. Returning to the argument of the particle and leaping forward with a whole universe, not a science and in fact is totally dishonest. The word 鈥 鈥 干 rigins? Not addressed but that certainly has been misused.
Curiosity biggest leap is needed is where you lose the whole. Interspersed with Hawking 's comments and guessing about the use of simple alternative kind of science to explain the universe, which are then taken on an exciting journey through the universe whirls around to reach a nameless hole black giant. This is where we are told that all matter, stars, planets and science, even 鈥 檚 revered creator, the original subatomic particle, vacuuming, and even time itself will cease to exist.
There are no allusions to the Bible or science of homeostasis is invoked to fully explain how or why, time ceases to exist and the meaning of condemnation of all things manages to prevail. Somehow the whole idea is like a scientific version inspired by hell. No hope, final and indescribable. Once again the faith which should be convened to accept this theory is incomprehensible.鈥 檚 The Bible version is certainly less cerebrally prosecutor, has a real historical context, and for most people even more gullible.
Curiosity concludes that since all the time stops when absorbed by the black hole, that God (if any) would not have had, or the chance to find, at any time in which to create the universe. It is here that I can only ask the reader to pause and carefully consider this conclusion. Who would have guessed that the priests of science, the development of their own particular species of eschatology. Now is an explanation of the beginning and end of all things.
The Bible says more than 150 times that God created man and the universe. We think that to say no, but we have to call him a liar over a hundred times, and yet we all and the scientist in the final cut for the great common denominator that we know as death. The difference between the believer and the scientist secular later, ie, that a group can only be wrong, and the other may be wrong and condemned. The best science can make men 鈥 檛 still can think, bet on a losing proposition as bad as that.
According to the Bible the law of nature does not limit God in any way. He natures of God, is that created time and he alone has the authority to initiate, and take over. Consequently this is exactly what the second coming of Christ and of every one who dies before that event.
鈥 淎 ª swore by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created the heaven and the things which are therein, and the earth, and things which are therein, and the sea, and things which are therein that there should be time no longer 鈥 (Rev 10, 6).?
Time and God 鈥 檚 authority over it is one of the biggest reasons the man needs to pay attention to laws, orders, and the gospel of Christ. We are strictly warned that because time as we know it is time we pay attention and obey every edict of God.
Although the past, present and future are equally known by God, its laws do not originate or belong to one or two of these segments we refer to in our understanding of time. He had no beginning and no end. His laws have left a realm far above the past, present or future. God 's laws come from a place called the eternal. It is a place that is not now, nor ever was, subject to the ravages of time. He does not care anything about the nature 鈥 ™ s laws of entropy and is not subject to the destructive power of a black hole.
According to the writings of the moon sun and stars that will someday be removed for the final resting place of men and women redeemed is a God who offers a new heaven and a new earth. He is the light of this planet and no artificial light is needed. The Bible says that raises the stars and the heavens like a scroll. That would include black holes and all suspicious of science along with them.
The prophet Daniel said that near the end of time as we know, man would have increased their knowledge of all things exponentially. Some 800 years later the apostle Paul commented on this new knowledge, saying that men would 鈥 淓 see learning and never able to get to know the truth 鈥 (2 Timothy 3: 7).? Paul later concluded that he was the man 鈥 檚 newfound knowledge that trap them in their own pride activates the trap of deception. 鈥 淧 rofessing be wise, they became fools 鈥 (Rom 1: 22)?
It is much like the man, who after jumping only a quarter of a million miles to the moon and back, a distance traveled by many frequent flyers of the earth, that I would talk about the distances we can not imagine in space outside. We also addressed the unknown distance between the beginning and the end? Perhaps science doesn 鈥 檛 think it is totally legitimate, not direct their own prophets empirical certificates. How presumptuous to remind of faith between them and the false prophets to warn the laity who have a full contingency of their own false prophets.
Long before Paul, the great prophet Isaiah by the power of the Holy Spirit, said the man, God's wisdom and knowledge 鈥 檚 should not be compared with ours. Can not be attributed anthropomorphic or transfer the intelligence and wisdom of God to a mere mortal. By any other name would be presumptuous and a great attempt to make us wiser than or equal to God.
Isaiah said, 鈥 淔 or my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the Lord. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts 鈥 (Isaiah 55: 8, 9).?
More surprising is the fact that God invites man to share this place called eternity. It has placed a door that no one on earth can enter, regardless of status, gender or age, and could care less if you have a good understanding of quantum physics or if it could give a shout about it. It takes faith to go through the door marked 鈥 榯 that cross of Christ, 鈥? But again, how long it takes faith to believe that science 鈥 檚 version of the beginning and end of all things?
After giving the apostle John a detailed description of all events that will precede the Second Coming of Christ says John why he has been a revelation. Not only tells John that he is the creator of all things, but he is also the only one who can bring everything to the end: I'm sorry black holes, Discovery Channel and Stephen Hawking.
鈥 淎 nd that saith unto me, Seal not the sayings of the prophecy of this book, because time is at hand. He that is unjust, let him be unjust still: and he which is filthy, let him be filthy still: and he that is righteous, be righteous still: and he that is holy, be holy still. And behold, I come quickly and my reward is with Me, to give every man according as his work. I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and last 鈥 (Revelation 22: 10-13).?
http://www.americanprophet.org has since 2005 had the articles of Rev Michael Bresciani columnist, along with news and comments have earned this place the title of the website for. Millions have read his timely reports and articles in online journals and print throughout the country and the world.
Related articles – Discovery Channel, Stephen Hawking, Curiosity, God created, homeostasis, the theory of relativity, eschatology, the cross of Christ, Revelation 22: 10-13, the large Pr,
Email this article to a friend!
Receive Articles like this directly to your email box one! Subscribe for free today!